Looseleaf Updates – February

Widdifield on Executors and Trustees – Carmen S. Thériault
Release #1 

What’s New?

4:7 General Rule in Estate Litigation: Costs Follow Event – In Joy Estate v. McGrath, 2022 ONCA 119, 2022 CarswellOnt 1457 (Ont. C.A.), Gillese J.A. commented upon the process to be followed where public policy considerations arise:

The jurisprudence is clear: at first instance, when deciding costs in estate litigation, the court must begin by carefully scrutinizing the litigation to determine whether one or more of the public policy considerations applies. If so, as a general principle, the parties’ reasonable costs are to be paid from the testator’s estate. It is worthy of note that this approach is not a balancing of the public policy considerations against the rationale for costs rules that ordinarily apply to civil litigation.  Rather, it is a sequential analysis, the first step of which is to determine whether one or more of the public policy considerations apply.  If so, generally the parties’ reasonable costs should be payable from the estate.  A departure from this general principle requires justification on the part of the court.

4:15 Special Costs – The court will order special costs in exceptional circumstances where the conduct is reprehensible, which encompasses scandalous or outrageous conduct (such as conduct tantamount to fraud or an abuse of process), as well as milder forms of misconduct deserving of reproof or rebuke: Kirouac Esate, 2024 BCSC 1119, 2024 CarswellBC 1847 (B.C. S.C.)

4:24 Solicitor Appointed as Executor/Trustee –  In Re Parkinson Estate, 2024 MBCA 52, 2024 CarswellMan 217 (Man. C.A.), the court awarded $110,139.17 in solicitor and client costs against an executor who was a lawyer.  The court was highly critical of the executor’s conduct, including a dispute over compensation which the court viewed as being wholly due to the executor seeking an unreasonable level of compensation and then attempting to bolster his position by issuing invoices for unsubstantial legal services when his executor compensation was questioned.

The Regulation of Professions in Canada – James T. Casey
Release #1
 

What’s New?

The Applicability of the Duty of Fairness – Appendix 7A – Case Digest – A section has been added to the Appendices in Chapter 7 – 7A:6.10 Mortgage Brokers.  The following case digest has been added:

Professions and occupations – Mortgage brokers – Organization and regulation of profession – Financial Services Regulatory Authority issued notice of proposal to revoke license of applicant mortgage broker and principal – Broker filed request for hearing – Broker’s motion for request to be published on website of authority was dismissed – Broker brought application to quash or amend proposal, and challenge transparency guidance regarding authority to take regulatory action against, as mandamus relief was not available – Portions of application seeking declaration with respect to publication of proposal were not struck, leaving that issue open to Divisional Court – Broker brought motion to vary order, and to restore application regarding relief sought – Motion dismissed – Trial judge correctly held that it was plain and obvious that application to strike or amend proposal could no succeed as it was premature – Tribunal hearing provided adequate alternative remedy, and broker would get full and fair hearing de novo to resolve any alleged procedural fairness issues – Exceptional circumstances bring rule of law into disrepute, going beyond breaching procedural fairness or acting without jurisdiction, were not present – Balance of judicial review application dismissed – Decisions at issue were not statutory powers of decision and were not amenable to judicial review – To be subject to judicial review decision must affect legal rights or obligations – Although applicants had interest in their reputation, publication of allegations  by regulator did not give rise to right to judicial review: Harold the Mortgage Closer Inc. v. Ontario (Financial Services Regulatory Authority, Chief Executive Office), 2024 CarswellOnt 12109, 2024 ONSC 4464 (Ont. S.C.J. (Div. Ct.)).

The ITL Experience Survey | Enquête sur l’expérience des avocats formés à l’international

Main text of the image says: The ITL Experience Survey, your voice matters. Sponsors of the survey are The ITL Conference, Osuji and Smith Lawyers, The Counsel Network, and Caldwell. The background image is a grid of portraits showing a diverse group of professionals.

(le français suit l’anglais)

The ITL Experience Survey

The ITL Conference, in partnership with The Counsel Network and with the support of Osuji & Smith Lawyers, is launching a survey aimed at capturing and analyzing the lived experiences of internationally trained lawyers (ITLs) in the legal profession.

This survey will gather valuable data on various aspects of the ITL experience, including the requalification process, articling, experiences within law firms and other employers, opportunities for career advancement, social and cultural integration, mentorship opportunities, and post-qualification practice. The data collected will play a pivotal role in advocating for meaningful changes and improvements within the legal profession.

If you are an ITL, now is your chance to make your voice heard. Please take a moment to complete the survey and share it with other ITLs in your network.

Complete the survey here: https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/8159149/ITL25

********************************************

Enquête sur l’expérience des avocats formés à l’international

La Conférence ITL, en partenariat avec The Counsel Network et sponsorisée par Osuji & Smith Lawyers, lance une enquête visant à recueillir et analyser les expériences vécues des avocats formés à l’étranger dans la profession juridique.

Cette enquête collectera des données précieuses sur divers aspects de l’expérience des avocats formés à l’étranger, notamment le processus de requalification, le stage, les expériences au sein des cabinets d’avocats et autres employeurs, les opportunités de progression de carrière, l’intégration sociale et culturelle, les opportunités de mentorat et la pratique après la qualification. Nous croyons que ces données sont essentielles pour plaider en faveur de changements significatifs au sein de la profession juridique.

Si vous êtes un avocat formé à l’étranger, c’est le moment de vous faire entendre. Prenez un moment pour compléter l’enquête et la partager avec d’autres avocats formés à l’étranger de votre réseau.

Complétez l’enquête ici: https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/8159149/ITL25

Launch of the Justice Canada Survey of Criminal Justice System Stakeholders / Lancement du Sondage auprès des intervenants du système de justice pénale de Justice Canada

(le français suit l’anglais)

The Department of Justice Canada (Justice Canada) has launched the Survey of Criminal Justice System Stakeholders: Efficiencies, Legislative Amendments, and the Ongoing Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic. You are strongly encouraged to share your views and experiences to better inform the development of criminal justice system laws and policy in Canada.

About the survey:
This survey examines stakeholders’ perceptions of criminal justice system (CJS) efficiencies in general as well as explore the potential impacts of recent legislation concerning criminal court efficiencies, remote court attendance, and bail, and the COVID-19 pandemic on the CJS. The survey includes, among others, questions about remote court appearances, bail, administration of justice offences, judicial referral hearings, preliminary inquiries, and overall impacts on Indigenous and racialized people and other vulnerable populations.

Who can participate:
Justice Canada is looking to hear the perspectives of criminal justice system professionals who have experience within Canada’s criminal court system within the last six months. This includes the judiciary, defence counsel, crown prosecutors, police/peace officers, court administrators, and more. Please note that the survey only seeks individual-level responses. Organizational responses are not eligible to be included.

Why you should consider participating:
Participation in this survey will provide evidence to inform future policy development on the efficient and effective operation of the CJS by understanding the perceived implications of the amendments and the pandemic on CJS functioning, and identifying areas where CJS professionals feel additional amendments are required.

How to participate in the survey:
The survey will be open to participants until March 21, 2025.

The survey will take between 15 and 35 minutes to complete. You will be able to limit which sections you are asked to answer based on your experiences. If needed, you can save your answers and come back to it later.

The Department of Justice is subject to the Privacy Act and is committed to your privacy and the protection of your personal information. Your participation is voluntary and appreciated. Your responses will remain confidential.

Please click on the link below to access the survey (or copy and paste the link into your internet browser).
Survey link: https://form.simplesurvey.com/f/s.aspx?s=6d649078-c15d-415d-bd8a-c85e17216486

Justice Canada thanks you in advance for your valuable contribution. Should you have any questions or require further information, please don’t hesitate to contact Lysiane Paquin-Marseille.

Le ministère de la Justice du Canada (Justice Canada) a lancé le Sondage auprès des intervenants du système de justice pénale : efficiences, modifications législatives et répercussions continues de la pandémie de COVID-19. Nous vous encourageons fortement à partager vos points de vue et vos expériences afin de mieux éclairer l’élaboration des lois et des politiques du système de justice pénale au Canada.

À propos du sondage :
Ce sondage examine les perceptions des intervenants à l’égard de l’efficience du système de justice pénale (SJP) en général, ainsi que les répercussions potentielles des récentes lois concernant l’efficience des tribunaux de juridiction pénale, la comparution à distance et la mise en liberté sous caution, ainsi que la pandémie de COVID-19 sur le SJP. Le sondage comprend des questions concernant, entre autres, les comparutions devant les tribunaux à distance, la mise en liberté sous caution, les infractions contre l’administration de la justice, les comparutions pour manquement, les enquêtes préliminaires et les répercussions globales sur les Autochtones et les personnes racialisées et les autres populations vulnérables.

Qui peut participer :
Le ministère de la Justice du Canada souhaite connaître le point de vue des professionnels du système de justice pénale qui ont acquis de l’expérience au sein du système judiciaire pénal du Canada au cours des six derniers mois. Cela comprend les juges, les avocats de la défense, les procureurs de la Couronne, les policiers et les agents de la paix, les administrateurs de tribunaux, etc. Veuillez noter que le sondage vise uniquement à obtenir des réponses individuelles. Les réponses organisationnelles ne sont pas admissibles.

Pourquoi devriez-vous envisager de participer :
La participation à ce sondage fournira des données probantes pour éclairer l’élaboration future de politiques sur le fonctionnement efficient et efficace du SJP en comprenant les répercussions perçues des modifications et de la pandémie sur le fonctionnement du SJP et en cernant les domaines où les professionnels du SJP estiment que des modifications supplémentaires sont nécessaires.

Comment participer au sondage :
Le sondage sera ouvert aux participants jusqu’au 21 mars 2025.

Il vous faudra entre 15 et 35 minutes pour répondre au sondage. Vous pourrez limiter les sections auxquelles on vous demande de répondre en fonction de vos expériences. Si nécessaire, vous pouvez enregistrer vos réponses et y revenir plus tard.

Le ministère de la Justice est assujetti à la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels et s’engage à protéger votre vie privée et vos renseignements personnels. Votre participation est volontaire et appréciée. Vos réponses resteront confidentielles.

Veuillez cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous pour accéder au sondage (ou copiez et collez le lien dans votre navigateur Internet).
Lien vers le sondage : https://form.simplesurvey.com/f/s.aspx?s=6d649078-c15d-415d-bd8a-c85e17216486

Le ministère de la Justice du Canada vous remercie à l’avance de votre précieuse contribution. Si vous avez des questions ou si vous souhaitez obtenir de plus amples informations, n’hésitez pas à communiquer avec Lysiane Paquin-Marseille.

Canada’s Black Justice Strategy Community Presentation on March 5, 2025

The University of Manitoba Faculty of Law invites members of Winnipeg’s Black community and the UM community to a special evening featuring the only community presentation of Canada’s Black Justice Strategy.

Join us on March 5, 2025, for a keynote presentation by Zilla Jones, co-author of the report, followed by a panel discussion with distinguished Black experts:

  • Dr. Delia Douglas (Office of Anti-Racism, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences)
  • Ms. Ashley Carruthers, NP (CEO, Nurse Practitioner Association of Manitoba)
  • Ms. Michelle Jean-Paul (Assistant Superintendent, Louis Riel School Division)

The discussion will be moderated by Ms. Mandy Ambrose (Director of Prosecutions, Manitoba Justice).

Event Details
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Location: Robson Hall, 224 Dysart Rd, Winnipeg
Doors open: 5:30 p.m. | Keynote & panel: 6:00 p.m.
Reception to follow, catered by K&S Island Grill

Admission is free, but registration is required as seating is limited.

  • Black community members: Registration opens February 18
  • General registration: Opens February 21

Register here: https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=C92AT4wzTE6KFJBEaWL3uILZ8hjTxvtBnE_tFohy8SRUQTc4UlVLRjkxM0pLWktDNDNaMlM0TlRDTC4u&route=shorturl

Free parking available behind Robson Hall: UM Parking Map or search “University of Manitoba L Lot” on Google Maps