“Please be advised that effective April 15, 2026, and until further notice, the Associate Judges, Winnipeg Centre, will be adding a weekly list to hear without notice notices of motion that fall within the Associate Judges’ jurisdiction in the Family Division and General Division of the Court. This list will be held weekly on Wednesday at 2:00 p.m. A form of Order for consideration of the presiding Associate Judge should be submitted with the required motion materials.
Nothing in this notice is meant to restrict parties from continuing to have without notice notices of motion heard on the daily Winnipeg Associate Judges’ uncontested list at 9:30 a.m. In other words, without notice motions may be filed on either list.
The new without notice list will be heard by way of teleconference. The teleconference number is 1-833-231-5001 with a Participant ID number of 5763182.”
March 16, 2026, News ReleaseManitoba Government Grows Nursing Workforce as Record 45 Nurses Set to Graduate Intensive Care Unit Training “The Manitoba government is strengthening intensive care unit (ICU) capacity with a record 45 nurses completing specialized critical care training this spring and preparing to work in hospitals across the province, Premier Wab Kinew and Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care Minister Uzoma Asagwara announced today.”
March 17, 2026, News Release Manitoba Government Funding Five Rural Community Projects “The Manitoba government is investing almost $340,000 to support five projects that celebrate francophone culture and support francophone communities through the From the Ground Up – Safe Healthy Communities for ALL program, Municipal and Northern Relations Minister Glen Simard, minister responsible for francophone affairs, announced today.”
March 17, 2026, News Release Manitoba Government Ending Predatory Pricing in Grocery Stores and Other Retail “The Manitoba government has introduced an amendment to the Business Practices Act that would ban retailers from using consumers’ personal data to increase the price of goods for a specific consumer, Public Service Delivery Minister Mintu Sandhu announced today.”
March 19, 2026, News ReleaseManitoba Government Supports Harvest Manitoba’s First Steps Infant Care Program “The Manitoba government is investing $300,000 through the Mino’Ayaawag Ikwewag: All Women Doing Well strategy to increase access to infant nutrition and care items for families, Families Minister Nahanni Fontaine, minister responsible for women and gender equity, announced today.”
March 19, 2026, News ReleaseManitoba Government to Build Personal Care Home in Winnipeg’s Bridgwater Neighbourhood “The Manitoba government will build a new personal care home (PCH) in the Bridgwater neighbourhood of Waverley West, with community consultations beginning in June, Premier Wab Kinew and Health, Seniors and Long-Term Care Minister Uzoma Asagwara announced today.”
require a landlord to file information about each of their rental units with the Director of Residential Tenancies;
require a landlord to provide at least 24 hours’ notice to the current tenant before showing a rental unit to a prospective tenant;
require the provisions of the Act dealing with rent regulation to be reviewed by the director every five years;
provide that a decision against a tenant that does not involve safety or unlawful activity must be removed from public access after seven years, or earlier on application of the tenant;
authorize an administrative penalty to be issued for failing to comply with any order made by the director under the Act; and
increase the maximum administrative penalty amount from $5,000 to $10,000.
Bill 15 The Consumer Protection Amendment Act/Loi modifiant la Loi sur la protection du consommateur – The Consumer Protection Act is amended. A supplier of a consumer good designated in the regulations must make the parts, tools, software and manuals necessary to repair the consumer good (the “means of repair”) available to the buyer. Subject to the regulations, the means of repair must be made available for a reasonable time period after the sale, at a reasonable price and within a reasonable time period after the buyer requests them. The supplier must disclose to the buyer before the sale if the supplier is exempted from any of these requirements.
Bill 20 The Manitoba Hydro Amendment Act/Loi modifiant la Loi sur l’Hydro-Manitoba – The Manitoba Hydro Act is amended to enable the corporation to establish a curtailable power program for customers engaged in cryptocurrency operations. Under the program, a customer’s supply of power may be temporarily reduced for the purposes of the program.
Bill 21The Drinking Water Safety Amendment Act/Loi modifiant la Loi sur la qualité de l’eau potable – The Drinking Water Safety Act is amended to expand the director’s authority to classify water systems. The director’s classifications must be made in accordance with the regulations and approved by a medical officer. Amendments also address situations when the owner of a water system cannot be identified. In these circumstances, the director may order the person who owns or controls the land on which the water system is located to take responsibility for the water system. In addition, administrative amendments are made.
Bill 32 The Improving Access to Breast Cancer Screening Act/Loi visant à améliorer l’accès au dépistage du cancer du sein – The Improving Access to Breast Cancer Screening Act is established. The cancer authority must establish a screening plan to ensure that individuals who have an increased risk of developing breast cancer are eligible to access breast cancer screening services. The cancer authority must also establish a plan to increase access to breast cancer screening throughout Manitoba. The plan must set out annual targets respecting the rate of participation in screening programs. The plans must be updated every five years. The cancer authority and the provincial health authority must prepare an annual report on the extent to which the established targets have been achieved.
The meaning of “bullying” is expanded to include conduct that creates a negative or unsafe school environment for groups or classes of persons. The use of artificial intelligence is recognized as a potential form of bullying.
A school’s code of conduct must address the appropriate use of artificial intelligence. The code of conduct continues to apply to students but no longer applies to staff.
A school board must appoint a qualified person to be the superintendent. The superintendent is responsible for the general administration of the school division or school district and is to oversee or participate in the hiring of employees of the school division or school district.
A consequential amendment is made to The Education Administration Act. The Manitoba School Boards Association Act is amended to allow Indigenous educational organizations and other organizations to become members of the Manitoba School Boards Association.
Bill 40 The Elections Amendment Act/Loi modifiant la Loi électorale – The Elections Act is amended to require a candidate to disclose whether they have contravened The Conflict of Interest (Members and Ministers) Act. Disclosure is not required if the Assembly ordered that the member be reprimanded as a result of the contravention.
Bill 41 The Promoting Inclusion in Amateur Sport Act/Loi sur la promotion de l’inclusion dans le sport amateur – The Promoting Inclusion in Amateur Sport Act is established. Each provincial sport organization must adopt an inclusion policy that promotes the participation of persons from underrepresented groups in the sport. A provincial sport organization’s board members and staff must complete inclusion courses specified by Sport Manitoba. A provincial sport organization must conduct an assessment of participants in its sport to determine if there are underrepresented groups in the sport. The organization must prepare a report each year that reviews its efforts to increase participation in the sport.
Drivers and Vehicles Act – The term “antique motor vehicle” is to be defined in the regulations. A driver training school must enter a written contract with a student and the student may cancel their contract and receive a refund in certain circumstances. A school must make information available to the public about their operations and file an annual report with the registrar. The registrar is required to maintain a public registry of these schools. Driver training schools are no longer governed by The Private Vocational Institutions Act. References to registration documents in The Off-Road Vehicles Act are clarified.
Highway Traffic Act – Amendments are made to allow a farm truck to be used to transport any individuals and a light farm truck to be used to transport property for the personal use of the owner or a family member or employee of the owner.
Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act – Amendments are made to expand coverage for counselling services. A person who witnesses a serious accident or is a family member of a person seriously injured in an accident is now entitled to reimbursement of expenses incurred for counselling. The corporation is given discretion to reimburse the expenses of a victim in instalments, if the victim requests it, and to pay these expenses directly without a request from the person entitled to reimbursement.
govern the use of low-powered personal electric vehicles such as electric kick-scooters, skateboards, self-balancing scooters and unicycles;
govern three-wheeled vehicles; and
clarify that the use of an automated driving system is allowed only if authorized under a pilot project or by a technology testing permit.
The Highway Traffic Act and The Drivers and Vehicles Act are amended to require all motor vehicles and trailers to be registered and plated even if a permit is issued for the motor vehicle or trailer exempting it from weight and dimensions requirements. Consequential amendments are made to The Off-Road Vehicles Act and The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act.
Bill 44 The Minor Amendments and Corrections Act, 2026/Loi corrective de 2026 – The Minor Amendments and Corrections Act, 2026 corrects typographical, numbering and other drafting errors. Amendments are made to the French version of various Acts to update language and terminology and to ensure compatibility between the English and French versions. Other minor amendments are also made to various Acts. Five private Acts are repealed.
New investor protection measures are added, including prohibitions on certain representations, false statements and unfair practices while engaged in promotional activities. Aiding, abetting and counselling someone to contravene securities law is also prohibited.
The Manitoba Securities Commission is given the authority to regulate benchmarks that are used for reference in determining the value of or amounts due under contracts, securities and other financial instruments.
The commission is given the authority to designate a dispute resolution service for the investment industry. The designated dispute resolution service may make binding decisions when resolving a dispute.
Under amendments to civil liability provisions, a person that consents to provide information in an offering memorandum or other prescribed disclosure document is subject to the same liability as if they had provided the information in a prospectus. Amendments to certain defences shift the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant.
An investor is permitted to apply to the commission for a compensation order despite having commenced a civil action for damages to recover the same financial loss.
Bill 47 The Apprenticeship and Certification Amendment Act/Loi modifiant la Loi sur l’apprentissage et la reconnaissance professionnelle – The Apprenticeship and Certification Act is amended to require an online public registry to be established that provides information about journeypersons and other specified persons who are subject to the Act. The executive director is authorized to share information with educational institutions and other persons providing technical training or other services under the Act.
Pharmaceutical Act – Amendments are made to authorize a pharmacist to prescribe a substitute drug if it has the same therapeutic effect as a drug originally prescribed by another health care practitioner. The health care practitioner that issued the original prescription or the patient may instruct a pharmacist not to make a therapeutic substitution.
Regulated Health Professions Act – Amendments are made to enable colleges and associations that regulate health professions to amalgamate. An amalgamation may be requested by a college or association or initiated by the minister. The minister initiates the amalgamation process by making an order appointing a first council of the amalgamated college and, if necessary, appointing an administrator to assist with the amalgamation. The regulation to continue the pre-amalgamation colleges and associations as an amalgamated college must be made by the Lieutenant Governor in Council. Amendments are also made to an unproclaimed Part of the Act to reflect the amendments made to The Pharmaceutical Act.
Public Health Act – Amendments are made to clarify that a detention order may be varied on application by a public health official or the detained person. In addition, a request by a public health official to extend the duration of a detention order is to be heard by a provincial court judge rather than a judge of the Court of King’s Bench.
the provision of information about the use of artificial intelligence systems;
the development of accountability frameworks; and
the reporting of cybersecurity incidents.
The regulations could also set technical standards for the use of artificial intelligence systems and cybersecurity. In addition, the minister may issue directives about cybersecurity to specific public sector entities.
Bill 204 The Timely Construction of Residential Housing Act/Loi sur la construction de logements résidentiels en temps opportun – The Timely Construction of Residential Housing Act is established. A municipal authority may revoke a building permit that authorizes the construction of residential housing if the developer fails to complete the construction within a specified period. A developer who objects to the revocation of their building permit may appeal to the Municipal Board. If the Municipal Board overturns the revocation of a building permit, it must set a new deadline to complete the construction of the residential housing.
Bill 220 The School Bus Seat Belt Safety Act/Loi sur les ceintures de sécurité dans les autobus scolaires – The School Bus Seat Belt Safety Act is established. Each school bus manufactured after 2026 must be equipped with three-point seat belts for passengers. Every school division, school district and independent school must establish and implement a policy respecting student use of seat belts on school buses that are equipped with seat belts.
Financial Admin. Act, Appropriation Act, MB Dev. Corp. Act (March 11, 2026) – The Minister of Business, Mining, Trade and Job Creation requests that Manitoba make a loan to Scimar Ltd. in the amount of $300,000. The Loan is to be administered by MDC, as agent for Manitoba.
Families
Public Service Act, Interpretation Act (March 11, 2026) – Rheanna McEwen-McMillan is appointed to the position of Special Assistant within the classification of Special Assistant to the Minister (SPM).
Health, Seniors, and Long Term Care
Chiropractic Act (March 11, 2026) – Lauralee Gooding of Winnipeg is appointed as a lay member of the Board of The Manitoba Chiropractors Association for a term of two (2) years commencing March 11, 2026.
Public Service Act (March 11, 2026) – Vassan Aruljothi is appointed to the position of Tour Officer within the classification of Professional Officer 9 (P9).
Radiation Protection Act (March 11, 2026) – A proclamation is to be issued by the Lieutenant Governor fixing January 31, 2027, as the day on which The Radiation Protection Act, S.M. 2015, c. 41, comes into force.
Justice
Public Service Act; Interpretation Act (March 11, 2026) – Pawanjot Sandhu is appointed to the position of Executive Assistant within the classification of Executive Assistant to the Minister (EXM).
Schedule C (Minister of Agriculture) and Schedule O (Minister of Natural Resources and Indigenous Futures) are amended in the entry for The Wildlife Act by striking out “as it pertains to big game and migratory waterfowl”.
Schedule D (Minister of Business, Mining, Trade and Job Creation) is amended by adding the following: The CentrePort Canada Act C 44
Schedule R (Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure) is amended by striking out the following: The CentrePort Canada Act C 44
Public Service Act; Interpretation Act (March 11, 2026) – Komalpreet Sangha is appointed to the position of Special Assistant to the Premier within the classification of Special Assistant to the Premier (SAP).
This release features updates to the case law and commentary in the following chapters: 8 (Statutory and Constitutional Procedural Requirements), 9 (Pre-Hearing Participatory Rights: Notice, Disclosure, Delay and Adjournments), 10 (The Hearing and Participatory Rights), 11 (Interest, Bias and Independence), 12 (Review of the Decision-Making Process), 13 (The Grant of Authority), 14 (Review of the Exercise of Authority: Administrative Adjudication), and 15 (Review of Non-Adjudicative Administrative Action).
Highlights
The Courts remained busy in late 2024 and early 2025 issuing a number of decisions that have important implications for the judicial review of administrative action in Canada. Below is brief summary of some of the most notable decisions.
Honour of the Crown In Quebec (Attorney General) v. Pekuakamiulnuatsch Takuhikan, 2024 SCC 39, the Supreme Court concluded that contracts between the Crown and Indigenous communities may engage the honour of the Crown. In brief, the issue before the Court was a tripartite agreement between Canada, Quebec and Pekuakamiulnuatsch Takuhikan to fund an Indigenous police force for the Indigenous community. Overtime it became clear that the funding was insufficient to meet the police force’s needs. The police force ran a significant deficit. Pekuakamiul nuatsch Takuhikan sought to negotiate appropriate funding. Canada and Quebec refused to do so. Pekuakamiulnuatsch Takuhikan sued.
The Supreme Court set out a two part-test to determine if the honour of the Crown has been engaged by contracts between the Crown and Indigenous communities. The Court wrote as follows:
[161] First, the agreement in question must be entered into by the Crown and an Indigenous group by reason and on the basis of the group’s Indigenous difference, which reflects its distinctive philosophies, traditions and cultural practices. [162] It is well settled that the principle of the honour of the Crown rests on the “special relationship” between the Crown and Indigenous peoples. As in the case of an explicit obligation owed to an Indigenous group and enshrined in the Constitution, the honour of the Crown is engaged only by an obligation assumed by the Crown on the basis of its “special relationship” with the Indigenous group, which is different from the one it has with population in general. … Moreover the honour of the Crown will apply only if the contract has a collective dimension. Agreements relating to individual rights, even if they are between the State and an Indigenous contracting party, will generally not engage the honour of the Crown. [1631 Second, contractual agreements will engage the honour of the Crown where they relate to an Indigenous right of selfgovernment, whether the right is established or is the subject of a credible claim. In the case at bar, Pekuakamiulnuatsch Takuhikan argues that having an Indigenous police force is an exercise of. its right of self-government. I therefore take care to limit my comments accordingly. While we do not have to decide the question in order to resolve this case, I am not, however, excluding the possibility of recognizing, in a different context, that other Indigenous rights or interests might also engage the honour of the Crown in connection with a contractual undertaking.
The Supreme Court also provided insight on the remedies available where the honour of the Crown has been breached. The Supreme Court noted that, as part of “reconciliatory justice”, remedies should be alert to Indigenous perspectives and should compensate claimants not only for past wrongs but also “place the parties on the path to reconciliation.”
Production of Documents In United States of America and Rabang, 2025 BCCA 7, the British Columbia Court of Appeal considered a request for disclosure with respect to the Minister’s decision to surrender a fugitive in the context of an extradition hearing. The Court of Appeal held that the appropriate framework for considering the request was through the application of principles of judicial review of the decision makers. In applying these principles, the Court of Appeal concluded that disclosure should be limited to the materials actually before the decision-maker. As such, communications that were not before the decision-maker do not form part of the record, even where summaries of those communications were considered by the Minister.
Defamation Damages In James Bay Resources Limited v. Mak Mera Nigeria Limited, 2025 ONCA 448, 2025 CarswellOnt 10017, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that it was an error to award substantial damages to a corporation that had been defamed absent admissible evidence of harm or impact.
Punitive Damages InChung v. Chung, 2025 BCCA 136, 2025 CarswellBC 1275, the British Columbia Court of Appeal held that it was an error not to award punitive damages against the respondent notwithstanding findings that the respondent had breached his fiduciary duties of loyalty and trust and took active steps to conceal that conduct for years. The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that these findings at trial “in their cumulative effect rationally required an award for punitive damages.”
Privacy Law In Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Ari, 2025 BCCA 131, 2025 CarswellBC 1206, the British Columbia Court of Appeal has confirmed that wherever privacy rights are violated, there is a loss to the plaintiff, regardless of whether the plaintiff is ever made aware of the violation.
This release features updates to Chapter 5-Conflicts of Interest in Litigation, Chapter 25-Rules of Professional Conduct, Chapter 26-Discipline Proceedings, Appendix IF-Issues in Focus and Appendix SLL-Selected Legal Literature.
Highlights
Chapter 26-Discipline Proceedings-§ 26:18. Penalty Although a reprimand is sometimes dismissively characterized as a “slap on the wrist”, the Law Society of Ontario Tribunal has observed more than once that a reprimand is not without reputational consequence, as a reprimand leaves “a permanent mark on a lawyer’s record and affects his professional reputation and future business opportunities”.
Law Society of Ontario v. Constantine, 2020 ONLSTH 15, quoted with approval in Law Society of Ontario v. Diamond, 2024 ONLSTH 145.
Issues in Focus-§ IF:2. How can a client be held to be contributorily negligent in professional negligence matters involving lawyers? The general standard regarding professional liability for lawyers is that “a lawyer is required to exercise the standard of care of the reasonably competent member of his profession similarly situated in the discharge of his retainer.” In failing to meet this standard, “[a) solicitor who in the course of carrying out a transaction conducts himself in a manner amounting to professional negligence is liable for the damages arising from his failure to meet his professional duties”. The test to be applied in cases alleging solicitor’s negligence will depend on various circumstances, including the sophistication and financial experience of the client, which may have an effect on the extent of the solicitor’s obligations to the client.
Several defences may be put forward to limit or negate liability for professional negligence, including contributory negligence on the part of the client. For the most part, it will be extremely difficult for a lawyer to demonstrate contributory negligence by the client. However, where the client is also a lawyer, or other sophisticated actor, contributory negligence may be easier to prove.
This release contains amendments and updates to the commentary in Chapter 2 (Assets); Chapter 4 (Expenses and Legal Costs); Chapter 5 (Bequests and Beneficiaries); Chapter 15 (Resignation, Removal and Appointment of Trustees); and Words and Phrases.
Highlights
Lapse-Anti-lapse provisions-Contrary intention The deceased’s will provided that her real estate was to be left to her husband and, in an Alternative Transfer of Property clause, if he predeceased her, a property was to be left to her son and another to her daughter. This clause provided that the son was to receive the property left to him “absolutely”, as was the daughter. The will also contained the common clause intended to exclude a testamentary gift from, for example, the beneficiary’s net family property under s. 4(2) of the Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3. The son predeceased the mother and the daughter argued that the two provisions manifested a contrary intention that would oust the operation of the anti-lapse provision. The court did not agree. It found that the words “for their own use absolutely”-or, as here, the word “absolutely” were not in themselves sufficient to demonstrate a contrary intention; this depended upon the totality of the will, the language used in the will, and the circumstances surrounding the creation of the will to determine the necessary intention of the testator. It concluded that the deceased’s intention in transferring the property to the son “absolutely” had its ordinary meaning, which is a gift of a full estate in fee simple. The word “absolutely” in the will did not express any intention to gift over the daughter should the son predecease the testator. With regard to the clause related to the Family Law Act, it found that the clause would only become operative if one of the beneficiaries separated or divorced. It was to protect her son during his lifetime and did not demonstrate an intention to prevent the property from passing to his wife following his death. The daughter also argued that the testator intended to treat her children equally and that the Alternative Transfer of Property clause was best understood as a class or joint gift of all her real property to her children. The court agreed that the testator generally sought to treat her children equally, but this general objective did not manifest an intention that would oust the anti-lapse provision in respect of the property: Devonport v. Devonport, 2024 ONSC 6764, 2024 CarswellOnt 19151 (Ont. S.C.J.), affirmed 2025 ONCA 753, 2025 CarswellOnt 18191 (Ont. C.A.).
Rectification of will-Intention of testator-Language of will requiring addition of words The cousins of the deceased initially applied for a declaration of intestacy, as to the residue of the deceased’s estate. The deceased’s will did not name a residual beneficiary. The residue made up the entirety of the estate. An application was granted in part, with partial intestacy declared by the application judge. The appellant was named the personal representative in the will but was not given a clear gift. The will stated only that: “[i]n the event that [the appellant] predeceases me then I bequeath my estate to the Dogwood Foundation”. The personal representative claimed that it was the deceased’s intention for her to be the beneficiary of the estate. The personal representative’s appeal from the application judgment was dismissed. The court found that conflicting inferences were present in the will, with extrinsic evidence being insufficient to clarify the testator’s intention. The Court of Appeal found that the will clauses were not inconsistent with the appellant’s claim but that the will could not be interpreted as naming a residual beneficiary based on its language without adding words, which was not the role of the court. The evidence for rectification was not sufficient:
7. That said, the problem created by the will as drafted is that the interpretation advocated for by the appellant is not available without adding a provision that is not there. In other words, even without treating any clause in the will as inconsistent with an intention that the appellant receive the residue of the estate, the will, as drafted, cannot be interpreted as naming a residual beneficiary. Rather, the appellant needed to make a case for rectification. This requires “clear and convincing evidence . . . that the will does not reflect the testator’s intentions because of (a) an accidental slip, omission or misdescription, or (b) a misunderstanding of, or a failure to give effect to, the testator’s instructions by a person who prepared the will”: Wills and Succession Act, SA 2010, c W-12.2, s. 39(1). On this record, with no evidence regarding the testator’s instructions, and only the contingency clause and some information about the testator’s circumstances and relationships that was of limited probative value, it was open to the chambers judge to determine that the testator’s intentions were not sufficiently clear.
Legal costs of executor-Executor defending removal application-Impact of testator’s responsibility for selection of estate trustee In a successful application to remove her sister as estate trustee, a beneficiary sought costs from the trustee personally as special costs, and an order that the trustee not be able to recover her own costs from the estate for defending this application. The court stated that there was precedent for denying costs from the estate for an executor who unsuccessfully defends themselves from removal on the basis that they are defending themselves personally in the litigation, not the estate, and it would be unfair to the beneficiaries: Levi-Bandel v. Talesiesin Estate, 2011 BCSC 247, 2011 CarswellBC 384 (B.C. S.C. [In Chambers]), paras. 33-36. It also said there was precedent for special costs being awarded against an executor who was removed for showing a troubling disregard for their duties as administrator and who placed their own interests above those of the beneficiaries: Estate of Forbes McTavish Campbell, 2015 BCSC 774, (sub nom. Campbell v. Campbell) 2015 CarswellBC 1254 (B.C. S.C.). It found, in this case, that the trustee had not been able to distinguish her own interests from those of the estate, and served her own interests by continuing to live in estate property, rent-free, for two and-a-half years despite her sister’s repeated demands for the sale and distribution of her inheritance. Also, the court found that the beneficiary had been required to hire legal counsel in this matter and did not have the means to pay for this outside the distribution of her inheritance from the estate. However, it found that part of the responsibility for the situation was rooted in the testator’s decision to appoint one of his daughters as executor of his will, knowing of the conflict between them. The court also noted that having the parties provide submissions on special costs would further delay the matter and eat into their resources and the resources of the estate. In its view the cost of further submissions and litigation would be disproportionate to the value of the estate. Given all the circumstances the court found, while acknowledging it was an increasingly rare outcome, that this was a case where the estate should bear the costs of the application: Koshman Estate (Re), 2025 BCSC 2193, 2025 CarswellBC 3f32 (B.C. S.C.).
The Manitoba Law Library would like to acknowledge with gratitude that we are situated on Treaty One Territory, the traditional lands of the Anishinaabe, Cree and Dakota peoples, and the homeland of the Métis Nation.
Great LEXpectations RSS Feed